NEC Elections 2022

UCU Left calls on members to vote for candidates who are committed to fighting for Health and Safety, workers’ rights, equality, and protecting the planet.  

In the coming UCU NEC elections it is important all members vote.  Low polls comfort only the employers, who use them as an argument for ignoring union reps.  

For a fighting union that defends education, working conditions and the planet

The ballot envelope, with "CES" in the top corner to help you identify it.
Look out for your ballot envelope! It is A4 and has “CES” in the top left corner.

We recommend voting for the following candidates:

Post Candidate
Vice President1Rhiannon Lockley
Honorary Treasurer1Deepa Driver
Trustee1
2
John Parrington
Mike Barton
President UCU Scotland1Grant Buttars
Honorary Secretary UCU Scotland1Carlo Morelli
UK Elected FE1
2
Sean Vernell
Saleem Rashid
UK Elected HE1
2
3
Richard Wild
Rob Macmaster
Michael Carley
North West FE1Nina Doran
North West HE1
2
Peta Bulmer
Bee Hughes
South FE1John Fones
South HE1
2
3
4
5
Aris Katzourakis
Ryan Burns
Ellen Owens
David Chivall
Michael Carley
Midlands FE1Dharminder Chuhan
Disabled HE1Roddy Slorach
LGBT+ Members1Bee Hughes
Migrant Members1Patricia Prieto Blanco
Black Members1Nitin Rajyaguru
Casually Employed1Cecily Blyther
Click on a candidate name to see their full election statement

For a union that defends education, working conditions and the planet

The drive by government and employers to slash jobs and worsen our working conditions is relentless. Runaway inflation along with hikes in National Insurance and soaring energy costs will make 2022 a year of falling living standards for all workers. Across FE, HE and Prison Education, managerialism is rife as our employers take advantage of the upheaval caused by the pandemic to erode our professional autonomy and strengthen their grip on every aspect of our working lives.

Workplace organisation

The only thing that stands in their way is strong union organisation at workplace level. Employers need to know that we can deliver successful strike ballots in response to their attacks. Whether it’s insisting on adequate Covid safety measures or resisting redundancies, success depends on UCU branches with strong rep structures which have the trust of members.

This has been shown time and again during the last year. In FE, the branches that beat the ballot thresholds won pay rises, some without even taking action. Strikes at CCCG in London forced an intrusive and punitive observation policy to be dropped. Liverpool University UCU showed that sustained industrial action, organised through daily mass meetings of members, can defeat even the most intransigent of employers. They prevented all 47 of the threatened compulsory redundancies.

UCU Left builds well-organised branches capable of mobilising members to fight for their own conditions and in defence of education. We organise solidarity with every struggle because the more we collectivise our fights, the stronger we are. This requires branch leaderships which understand the power of collective action, trust the membership to take action and operate in an open and democratic way.

Winning the HE disputes

The marketisation of higher education has been disastrous for staff and students alike. Universities that are in cut-throat competition with each other do not want the expense of a collective pension scheme and want to be free to drive down their staffing costs by slashing jobs, increasing workloads and minimising permanent contracts. Despite the sector being richer than ever, the employers use the weakest institutions to justify below inflation pay awards year after year. 

That’s why it’s crucial that we win the USS and Four Fights disputes. They are not just fights to defend education from the scourge of low pay, inequality and casualisation, they represent a challenge to the neoliberal model of education. Most students understand that a commodified, standardised product delivered by increasingly exploited and stressed staff is a shadow of what their education could be and support our struggle.

Fighting these disputes together maximises our strength by uniting branches and members across the sector. Decoupling the USS from the Four Fights would in practice mean delaying and deprioritising the Four Fights. This would not only be disastrous for pay and equality, it would also weaken the fight to defend USS pensions by giving our younger, casualised members no stake in the fight.

When the stakes are so high we cannot afford to wait until we have ‘supermajorities’ before we fight. Betting all or nothing on winning an aggregated ballot is an unnecessary gamble. We have to beat the anti-union laws and take action where we can, re-balloting where we miss the threshold. The other campus unions are learning this lesson and are starting to take action alongside us. 

Losing these disputes would be a major setback. The resources of the whole union must be put behind the sustained and escalating action we need to win.

Fighting for equality

Our education institutions are at the epicentre of the culture wars being waged by the Tories. Their attacks on ‘woke culture’ are part of an attempt to regain the ground they lost during last year’s Black Lives Matter, to defend the legacy of the Empire and their version of British history. Priti Patel wants to neutralise criticism of her barbaric demonisation of migrants, which results in people fleeing war and poverty, often caused by British interventions around the world, drowning in the English Channel.

The Higher Education Freedom of Speech Bill has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Its effect will be to allow anti-trans advocates, Holocaust deniers, anti-vaxxers, supporters of Israeli apartheid and others to espouse their views on campuses with the full protection of college authorities. As their attempt to impose the IHRA definition of antisemitism proves, in reality, the Tories want to ban views they don’t like.  

Our union must defend the right to free speech of the oppressed. This includes supporting the right of students to protest for equality and justice. We support efforts for a thorough decolonising of the curriculum: not the tick-box tinkering with reading lists that managements favour but one that enhances education by bringing hidden and marginalised histories and perspectives to light and critiquing established narratives. 

Our union must engage in a constant war against inequality in the workplace. The gender and race pay gaps are scandalous, while insecure employment blights the lives of too many of us. People of colour struggle to get promoted, and disabled staff are often denied the workplace adjustments that they need. Our migrant colleagues face onerous hurdles and additional costs for the right to work alongside us. We fight against these things because it is the right thing to do, but also because it is the precondition for the workplace unity that we need. 

At the heart of the movement for
climate justice

From melting polar ice caps, to raging forest fires and devastating floods, the evidence of catastrophic climate change is overwhelming and is being experienced on all continents. But last year’s COP26 conference did virtually nothing to alter the trajectory to environmental disaster we are on. Few people believe that even the weak promises made by governments will be adhered to, while a commitment to phase out coal was removed from the final statement.

The fossil fuel industrial complex can only be challenged by mass movements demanding climate justice. It is clear that while there are profits to be made from the fossil economy, corporate interests will resist every attempt to curtail it. The organised working class has a special role to play in the climate movement. It is only workers that can challenge the profits of the fossil multinationals, and only the workers’ movement that can ensure a just transition from labour that digs coal, drills oil and builds cars to labour that builds wind turbines, instals heat pumps and runs mass public transport. Stopping climate change requires system change. 

UCU has already played a central role in this movement. In 2019 it was a UCU motion that won TUC support for a work stoppage in support of the youth climate movement. We have an important role as climate educators, pushing to green the curriculum. We must press our institutions to decarbonise more quickly, the USS pension fund to disinvest from fossil fuels, and join our students and others on the streets.

Part of a wider struggle

Johnson’s government is inept and corrupt, and he has frittered away the support for his Brexit promises that won him the 2019 election. But the Tories are still attacking working people. They want to protect business during the pandemic whatever the cost in lives, and they are determined to make working people pay for the economic downturn. Johnson’s ‘levelling-up’ agenda is bogus, and his promises of a high wage future are belied by rampant inflation. The super-rich have added to their share of wealth throughout the pandemic. 

Resistance to the Tories is growing. There are more strikes as groups of workers exploit labour shortages to fight for pay rises. One-day and token strikes are being replaced by sustained and indefinite action. Workers increasingly realise that it is futile to hope that Starmer’s Labour Party will deliver anything for working people. Sharon Graham’s election to leader of the Unite union on a platform of strong, self-reliant fighting trade unionism is a step forward.

Now is the time for the trade union movement to launch a general assault to halt the squeeze on living standards and repel the bosses’ attacks. Not only do we need pay rises that exceed rapidly rising inflation, we also need mass united action to fund the NHS properly and bring utilities and social care into public ownership.

UCU already has good policies on these things and on much more. Putting them into practice as part of a wider trade union fight for social and economic justice requires an NEC that stands up for the interests of rank and file members and challenges the hesitancy and pessimism of many in the trade union leaderships.

For action to defend members and education – Vote Dharminder Singh Chuhan for NEC (FE UK-elected)

Vote Dharminder Singh Chuhan for NEC (FE UK-elected)

The election runs from 1-29 September

Download leaflet here.

My approach to unionism is based on building up teams of activists and a strong local branch. Local branches need to be in touch via Regional Committees with other branches.  We face the same problems and can support each other in our campaigns and struggles. My work over a number of years as a branch organiser has given me a real insight in to the needs of the rank-and-file membership.  With this experience my aim is to work constructively to make the union work for you and keep it democratic and accountable. We need to demonstrate that the presence of a trade union makes a real difference in the workplace.

As branch chair at Sandwell College I bring experience from a branch which has had successes through a number of disputes to

  • Remove walk-in observations
  • Introduce increments
  • Win 3 weeks of extra holiday and a sector-leading pay deal.

In the wake of Coronavirus FE is needed to train workers as the job market changes and workers enter new areas of employment.  The sector could make a major contribution to a green industrial revolution, preparing workers for climate change jobs. If all students regardless of class, race, gender, disability and sexual orientation are to have access to education, as is their right, it is essential that we keep that provision universal and inclusive. For this FE needs funding, which comes from a union prepared to take action for education.

I started my career as a field archaeologist. I entered teaching because I enjoy supporting students’ learning. However, it took me 8 years of working precariously before securing full time employment.  So, I have personal experience of the problems of casualization and strongly support the struggle for job security for all UCU members.

I am actively involved in anti-racist campaigning and have helped organize a number of events in the West Midlands including an anti-racist evening 50 years after Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood speech. I chair the West Midlands Black Members Network. I believe there is important work for UCU to do in supporting the growth of Black membership and leadership in our branches.

It is vital in the current climate that the concerns of members are at the centre of the work carried out by UCU:

  • Health and safety
  • Marketisation
  • Casualisation
  • Redundancy and Pay freezes
  • Workload
  • Bullying and harassment

As a UCU left backed candidate, I am committed to a branch-led approach to trade unionism: it is at this level that members must be equipped to defend our jobs and post-16 education provision itself. 

Trade union service:

  • 17 years main grade lecturer in FE (ESOL)
  • Anti-casualization officer, FE secretary (West Midlands regional committee).
  • Equality Officer
  • Branch Chair

UCU Left statement on NEC election results

The results of elections to the NEC were announced on Monday 8th March. They show impressive gains for UCU Left in the composition of the new NEC.

Of the 30 seats filled at this election, UCU Left supporters won half of them. This is despite the groupings within UCU shifting to add a third campaigning group to the existing landscape of the union.

UCU Left would like to thank all those who voted for us and who encouraged others to do so. 

UCU Left stood on a clear platform for fighting back against the escalating attacks by employers in both HE and FE. Our candidates have a track record of organising resistance to redundancies and unsafe workplaces in their own institutions, and have also been at the forefront of delivering solidarity for the various struggles that have taken place this academic year. We are committed to pushing the UCU beyond local disputes towards UK-wide action over the key issues that affect our members across post-16 education.

The fact that so many of us were successful is a sign that members recognise that the scale of the attacks we face demands more than local disputes, important though they are. The 86% rejection of the HE employers’ 0% pay ‘offer’ confirms that members believe our union needs to put its weight behind UK-wide action.

Our new NEC members join a number who are only half-way through their terms of office. For us, holding NEC seats is a means to an end, not an end in itself. Our goal is to use our influence on the leading body of the union to help mobilise members to fight for the pay and conditions we deserve, and in defence of the education that we provide.

In Further Education, this means finding ways in the short term to resist employers putting staff at risk of Covid in the return to colleges. It also means a serious campaign for proper funding for the sector, for decent pay rises for staff and for an end to casualisation and downgrading.

In Higher Education, it will mean another serious battle to defend the USS pension scheme from being destroyed by marketisation, plus a revival of the Four Fights over pay, casualisation, equality and workloads, all of which have become more urgent as a result of the pandemic.

We encourage members to get involved in fighting for another education that we all know is possible. Get in touch and join UCU Left, and link with grassroots activists around the UK through UCU Solidarity Movement.

We thank you again for your support, and look forward to fighting alongside you in the struggles ahead.

NEC Elections 2021

UCU Left calls on members to vote for candidates who are committed to fighting for Health and Safety, workers’ rights, equality, and protecting the planet.  

In the coming UCU NEC elections it is important all members vote.  Low polls comfort only the employers, who use them as an argument for ignoring union reps.  

Five Key Issues

The ballot envelope, with "CES" in the top corner to help you identify it.
Look out for your ballot envelope! It is A4 and has “CES” in the top left corner.

We recommend voting for the following candidates:

PostCandidate &
recommended voting order
(click to see statement)
Honorary Treasurer1 Professor Paul Anderson
Midlands HE1 Rhiannon Lockley
2 Alan Barker
Midlands FE1 Dharminder Chuhan
North West HE1 Saira Weiner
2 Sunil Banga
South HE 1 Mark Abel
2 Dr Deepa Govindarajan Driver
3 Richard Bradbury
South FE 1 Philip Wilson
UK-elected HE 1 Marion Hersh
2 Lesley McGorrigan
3 Maria Chondrogianni
4 Sunil Banga
UK-elected FE1 Margot Hill
2 Saleem Rashid
Representative of Disabled Members 1 Marian Mayer
Representative of LGBT+ Members1 Bee Hughes
Representatives of Black Members 1 Dr Deepa Govindarajan Driver
2 Juliana Ojinnaka

Health and Safety first.  Support industrial action to stop unsafe working

No return until it’s safeaction, not surveys, will protect people’s health

We all want to return to the universities and colleges when it is safe to do so, but we must resist any moves to pressurise any workers to return to workplaces until the pandemic is under control.  We need to develop collective ways to use Health and Safety legislation to protect us from unsafe conditions that put our lives and those of our communities at risk. But we also need to ballot for industrial action where employers are threatening to make workers work in unsafe conditions.  We must insist on all teaching being online until it is safe to return to face-to-face delivery. Instead of surveying members’ views on industrial action in the abstract, UCU needs to follow the NEU teachers’ union in holding mass online meetings to organise resistance to unsafe conditions. Despite Covid, we need to restore the full democratic life of all levels of the union so members and their elected representatives can share experiences and debate the best way forward. 

Viva NEU

The National Education Union has shown the way in defending workers’ health and safety.  We salute our NEU comrades.  Their determined resistance and mass member online meetings have forced the Government to close down the schools.  On Sunday 3rd January Boris Johnson on the Andrew Marr Show said parents should send their children to school on 4th January.  By 5th January the Government did a U-turn and imposed a national lockdown, closing schools for all except children of key workers and vulnerable children.  We oppose attempts to expand the definition of key workers and vulnerable children so that schools effectively stay open for most pupils.

Vaccines for the world

None of us are safe until everyone in the world is safe.  We must campaign for vaccines to be available cheaply or free for all countries in the world.  Oxfam has warned of a danger that people in many poorer countries of the world may not get a vaccine until 2022.  We need mass vaccination programmes worldwide.

End excessive workloads.  Better support for homeworking

Reduce workloads

Anyone with a basic understanding of teaching appreciates that developing online learning packages is not a simple matter of sticking lecture notes online.  Education staff need time and support to deliver online learning.  Many education staff are now exhausted with trying to cope since March with a rapid shift to online teaching.  There are also real Health and Safety issues about how many hours anyone can be expected to sit at a computer.  There are risks of damage to eyesight and general health and mobility.  The way the Government has repeatedly waited until too late to announce lockdowns has added to the stress and workloads.

Support homeworking

Too many members are finding homeworking presents a range of problems such as lack of IT support, too many online meetings and the impossibility of trying to combine a full-time job with full-time home-schooling of children.  Homeworking needs to be properly managed and supported, with clear contractual boundaries round expectations and working hours.  Parents who are home-schooling should not be expected to do a full-time job in addition and should be given reduced working hours without loss of pay.  University and college staff should be financially reimbursed for additional costs they incur, such as heating, lighting and electricity, as a result of homeworking and time for cleaning our workspaces must come out of our working hours.  As with any rapid transition in mode of working, people need time to learn new ways of working, genuine support and manageable workloads.

Defend Education.  Support our students

Rethink exams and assessment

Education is not only about assessment and qualifications.  It is about developing human beings and educating citizens for a democratic society.  Marketisation of education has led to an obsession with assessment at the expense of learning.  The pandemic has forced the cancellation of school and college exams. Now is the time to make that permanent and for a rethink about the purposes of education.  Any revised assessment methods and processes for school and university students must deliver fairness and protect students from excessive examination stress.

Digital poverty 

Given that much university, college and school-teaching will be online for some time, the Government must take action to end digital poverty and exclusion.  This means ensuring that all students and pupils have access to a computer and that all homes have decent broadband connections.  Where students, pupils and their parents or guardians need advice and tutorial support to enable online learning, this too must be provided.

Student accommodation

Higher Education students were conned into moving to university accommodation so that they could be milked for rent revenues. Marketised education means treating students as cash cows. We support rent strikes by students.

Carry on the struggles

Defending education also means defending the working conditions of the workforce.  UCU Left stands for carrying on the Four Fights in Higher Education.  We stand for action to defend pensions and for decent pay. The pandemic must not halt the fight to end casualisation, tackle the gender and race pay gaps and ensure manageable workloads.

Black Lives Matter.  Fight Racism and Fascism

Black Lives Matter

2020 was the year of the Black Lives Matter protests in the USA and world-wide.  Many Black people and many of their white allies declared their intention not to tolerate racism by police and governments any longer.  The Black Lives Matter movement has not only put the spotlight on policing; it has boosted moves to decolonise the curriculum and to critically examine building names and statues which celebrate individuals involved in the slave trade and in colonial exploitation.  The disproportionately high level of deaths of BAME workers and patients has demonstrated how healthcare and racial and class inequalities are inter-related.  Building a better future must include tackling inequalities based on class, race and sex.

Resist the far-right

In the USA and world-wide the defeat of Donald Trump in the presidential election has been a set-back for the far-right.  There are still too many right-wing politicians who engage in dog-whistle politics and open the door for the far-right and the fascists.  We work with students and groups like Stand Up to Racism to stop racists and fascists organising on campus and beyond. 

No Return to Austerity

The pandemic and the climate emergency are part of the same problem

Both have their roots in the exploitation of nature for profit and the failure of governments to take into account the environmental implications of methods of food production, poor food hygiene and failure to reduce carbon emissions.  Many people want to build a better world after the pandemic.  This includes tackling the climate emergency and improving hygiene standards, especially in food production and public transport.  We should campaign for universities and colleges to be zero-carbon.

No going back 

While there are aspects of pre-COVID normality many of us wish to return to, such as seeing friends and loved ones, the pandemic has also given some time to re-examine ways of living and working.  It has highlighted the value of the work of essential workers in health and social care, retail and transports.  These groups deserve better pay and better employment conditions, including an end to casualisation and pseudo self-employment.  Some workers would in future like a mix of working at home and in the workplace, subject to proper support for homeworking.  Housing standards need to be revised so that all homes have space for homeworking and outside space. Trade unions should campaign for ways of working and living which are more sustainable both economically and environmentally.

Pay and pay equality

Before the pandemic hit UCU was campaigning vigorously over pay and pay equality matters.  Union members had taken serious industrial action.  Our claims for pay rises, ending the gender and race pay gaps, and winning job security for casualised staff were mobilising members.  The issue of workloads too was a pressing concern for members, the subject of a victorious local dispute at Sheffield Hallam University.  These issues have not gone away.  UCU members want to see an end to intolerable workloads, an end to the rampant casualisation in post-16 education and improvements in pay and employment conditions.  Union members need to take action on these issues and make progress on them.

Oppose any return to austerity

There is a danger – if and when the pandemic is brought under control – that governments will bring in cuts in welfare and freezes in public sector pay to pass the costs of the furlough scheme and other emergency measures on to the working class.  They will also try to cut benefits for unemployed workers and cut pensions.  We must oppose any attempts to make the working class pay for the pandemic.  UCU needs to ally with other trade unions and campaign groups to resist austerity.

Build UCU democracy 

Many UCU branches have held effective meetings over conferencing platforms.  Congress 2021 must be a Congress which debates the full range of UCU business.  UCU members need our democratic structures now more than ever.  We must operate our democratic machinery to the full and use it to increase membership participation.

Vote Marian Mayer for VP & Peter Evans for LGBT+ rep

Elections for two important national UCU positions open this week. The first is for Vice President of the union, with the winner ultimately becoming President.

The UCU Left-supported candidate is Marian Mayer.

Marian has an excellent record as a rank and file activist, having turned her own branch at Bournemouth University into a fighting stronghold of the union. She played a huge role in the Four Fights dispute in HE, first by ensuring hers was one of the post-92 branches to get over the ballot threshold and take strike action, but also as a formidable national negotiator during that dispute.

As many in union positions, including some of the other candidates, now try to distance themselves from the strikes of the last academic year, Marian stands out as an unrepentant supporter of the Four Fights and of a fighting union.

The other election is for LGBT+ rep on the National Executive Committee. UCU Left is supporting Peter Evans, who works at South Thames College and is Chair of the Further Education Sector Committee for London Region of UCU. Peter has an impressive record fighting inequality as a trade union activist and will be an important addition to the NEC’s Further Education Committee if elected.

These elections take place over the summer, and during a pandemic. That means it will require an effort to get members to vote. Apart from people being on holiday, many ballot papers will be sent to workplace addresses where members won’t be able to access them.

Please ask your branch committees to circulate the election statements for our candidates (attached). It is the position of the union that all candidates’ election materials received by branches should be circulated to the membership to maximise the turnout and inform members.

At the same time, members should be reminded that if they cannot access their ballot paper because it has been sent to work, they can request a replacement here www.ucu.org.uk/elections to be sent to their home address.

Please also do what you can on social media to boost Marian’s and Peter’s profiles by ‘liking’ their Facebook pages, retweeting their tweets etc.

Resources and links

UCU VP and NEC elections 2020

Elections for the UCU Vice President (VP), National Executive Committee (NEC) and trustees will take place beginning 31st January and closing on 4th March. As many members do not take part in these elections, it’s important to encourage as many as possible to use their vote in order to strengthen the tradition of a strong member-led union.

 

Jo McNeill (Chair, Liverpool Uni UCU), Mark Abel (Chair Brighton UCU Coordinating Committee), Peter Evans (South Thames College Equality Rep) and Carlo Morelli (President UCU Scotland) on why they support Margot Hill for VP.

To ensure we have a VP and NEC committed to fighting for decent pay and conditions, vote for the UCU Left supported candidates listed below.

The VP this year is selected from the Further Education sector. However, ALL members (including members in HE and retired members) can vote for Margot Hill. Margot has led a series of successful disputes at Croydon College, particularly over casualisation, and has an excellent record as a union activist.

Please click on a candidate’s name to download their leaflet.

Vice President

Trustees

North East HE

North East FE

London and East HE

Midlands HE (casual)

UK-elected HE

Jo McNeill 1

UK-elected HE (casual)

UK-elected FE

UK-elected FE (casual)

Nina Doran 1

Women HE  

We dared to dream and now they will want to punish us: let’s organise

Corbyn speaking at rally 2 (1 of 1)

Boris Johnson’s victory at the general election has sent a shiver of fear down the spine of all those who dared dream that this election would bring about a government led by Jeremy Corbyn. A government that was caring and progressive. It has left many fearful for what the future might bring for themselves and their families.

I’d like to thank Jeremy Corbyn for giving us hope and for campaigning for an exciting alternative to the market driven austerity policies of the Tories and Liberal Democrats – the yellow Tories. Jeremy has been vilified throughout this campaign, indeed, ever since he was elected as leader of the Labour party. The vast majority of the mainstream press and the BBC have done all they can to smear him as a terrorist sympathiser, a Stalinist and an anti-Semite.

It is quite clear that Jewish people will not be more secure and be less threatened under a Johnson government. The man is a racist to his core. He is part of the same political tradition which introduced the first ever immigration act in 1905 – The Aliens act. An act brought in specifically to prevent Jewish people entering this country who were fleeing persecution from Eastern Europe. Johnson, continuing with this tradition, will introduce a points-based system to prevent migrants coming to this county.

So why did Labour lose and why did Johnson win with such a majority?

‘Let’s get Brexit done’

The Tories succeeded because Labour failed to cut across the central Tory message, ‘Get Brexit done’. As many of us argued you cannot ride roughshod over people’s democratic will. 17.4 million people voted to leave the European union. Some because they mistakenly believe that there are too many immigrants in Britain. Many more did so because of a visceral distrust of the political elite and the impact of austerity. We warned if Labour was turned into a Remain party with calls for a second referendum it would be severely punished in the election.

We also warned that by taking such a position, it would allow Johnson to pose as the champion of the working class defending their vote to leave against the establishment. And that was exactly what happened. The tragedy was that for too many Corbyn was seen as the establishment candidate and Johnson the anti- establishment candidate.

Why did working people vote for Johnson?

It is quite clear that the Tories understood the deep bitterness and the sense of betrayal that significant sections of the working class felt towards the Labour Party because of the position they took on a second referendum.

To woo them the Tories had to steal some of Labour’s programme; funding for the NHS, schools and social services. Johnson in his speech to the Tory faithful on Friday morning spoke directly to those within the working class who had voted for him. As ever the arch opportunist he said that he understood that, ‘your hands must have quivered over the ballot paper when putting your cross next to our candidate’. He understood that they lent the Tories their vote to get Brexit done and said that he would not betray that trust. Of course, he will.

However, this fracture between sections of the working class from some parts of the North and the Midlands and the Labour Party has been a long time in the making. Working people’s lives have been destroyed by successive Tory and Labour governments. Many councils run by the Labour Party have carried out cut after cut rather than organise resistance to the Tory offensive against the welfare state.  The levels of poverty are among the highest in the country. In many of the high streets in these communities even the charity shops are closed.

The damage was done way before 12th Dec 2019 to break the trust of working people in these areas in the Labour Party. This erosion was accelerated under Blair’s new Labour Party. For many the party became detached from the lives of working people. Under the leadership of Corbyn this began to be reversed. But due to pressure from the Blairites within the party to adopt a pro-Remain position, for many this confirmed that the party had not changed and was as remote as ever from the concerns of working people.

This is a devastating defeat for Labour. But it’s perhaps worth pointing out when the establishment attempt to bury Jeremy Corbyn that he achieved a higher share of the popular vote than Ed Miliband (2015), Gordon Brown (2010), Neil Kinnock (1987) and Michael Foot (1983). Corbyn’s Labour won more votes in 2019 than Labour did in 1983,1987, 2005, 2010 and 2015.

It was not only the Labour Party that suffered in this election. All those MPs who left the Labour Party and tried to set up a new party based on the centre ground and who campaigned for revoking article 50 were humiliated. Chukka Umunna, Luciana Berger and, in the Portillo moment of the night, Jo Swinson – all lost their seats.

We live in the ‘age of extremes’. The politics of the centre ground are no more. People want a break from the politics of the past 40 years that have failed so miserably and done so much damage to working people lives. We shouldn’t fear this we must embrace it.

Does Johnson’s success prove that a socialist manifesto is not popular?

A lot has been said and there will be a lot more about how Corbyn’s Socialist manifesto was the key problem. People in Britain have rejected Corbyn and his radical Socialism. From the awful Lord Johnson, leading the Blairite attack on Corbyn, to many Labour MPs, all will be lining up to attempt to finish off the Corbyn project.

Of course, this is not at all surprising. The vast majority of Labour MPs despise Corbyn and McDonnell’s leadership. They have done all they can to undermine them. They put out leaflets in their constituencies in the election campaign distancing themselves from Corbyn, leaked their views to ‘Tory friends’ about how terrible Corbyn is and peddled the Tory myths about Corbyn being an anti-Semite and a terrorist sympathiser. These MPs do not feel devastated like the rest us do at this moment of time. They are pleased that Corbyn did not win. They hated every part of the manifesto, wedded as they are to the belief that capitalism works, it just needs a bit of tweaking here and there.

Their betrayal must not be forgotten or forgiven.

There was a problem in the way that Labour’s campaign was conducted. Whilst the manifesto was more radical than 2017 the campaign wasn’t. Policy announcement after policy announcement offering more ‘free stuff’ did not convince people. Opinion polls show that nationalising rail, water and the gas industries are very popular policies. But without a higher level of struggle and a campaign that looked and felt different, to those that have been conducted in the past, then the confidence in the ability of a Labour Government being able to carry out these policies didn’t seem credible.

It is much easier for the likes of Johnson and Farage to put themselves forward as anti-establishment figures because all they have to do is stick two fingers up to the elite. Many of their actual polices are ones that cut with the grain of the prevailing orthodoxies of the time. Whereas a radical socialist manifesto that speaks of transferring the wealth and power from the rich to the poor, cuts against the grain of the ideas that dominate our society. The more passive people are the more likely they will feel that these policies are just not plausible.

Photo opportunities of Corbyn with children at a primary school or heading a football did not allow for Labour’s campaign to take off and inspire in the way it did in 2017. The mass rallies in 2017, gave a sense of excitement, a freshness and therefore credibility that these polices could be implemented. This kind of campaign raised the level of confidence because it was not about an individual but a movement.

There were opportunities to do this in 2019. Jeremy and other Labour MPs did turn up to UCU picket lines to show their solidarity. But the team around them did not try and make them a central part of the election campaign.

In London where Jeremy did turn up to support our picket lines, thousands would have turned out to greet him if we had known he was coming. In the week they were attacking Labour for saying they would fund the WASPI women we could have had JC leading thousands of women strikers fighting over pay, pensions, zero hours contracts and the gender pay gap. This would have helped to signify that Corbyn is the anti-establishment candidate and he has a movement that can deliver on these promises.

Our dream deferred

The media, press, political commentators, Labour and Tory MPs will be lining up to punish those who dared to dream and hope of a world where poverty, homelessness and inequality would be confined to the history books. Where urgent action is taken to tackle the climate crisis. The establishment were terrified that Corbyn could win. The more far sighted members of the establishment understood Corbyn has not come from out of space. He is a reflection of the real concerns and desires of millions of people in Britain today. Over 10 million voted for a radical Socialist programme. This time we did not succeed. The establishment breathed a sigh of relief. They got away with it. But for how long remains to be seen.

Real change has always come from below by ordinary working men and women organising to make their lives better. Parliament merely passes laws that reflect those struggles. Our UCU members in HE once again are leading the way in demonstrating that we can fight and win. They will be the first group of workers that will be taking national strike action in the Johnson era. Let’s make sure that we get behind them and encourage more to follow suit.

Once again thankyou Jeremy and John for offering us hope. There is no turning back. We have only just begun. See you on the picket lines.

Sean Vernell UCU NEC

I’m dreaming of a red Christmas….

Corbyn speaking at final rally

At last were off — the general election has been called. Out of the blocks comes Jacob Rees-Mogg telling us all how the people who died in Grenfell should have used their common senseand ignored the Fire Brigades advice and left their flats. What a despicable man. This was no slip of the tongue but someone dripping with class privilege revealing his total contempt for working class people.

Moggs very existence symbolises what this general election is all about, and why, as Jeremy Corbyn has said, it is a once in a generation opportunity to fundamentally shift the balance of power in our society. We have a clear and straight choice in this election. Will it be five more years of the Etonian elite, passing policy after policy that continues to reward the rich and powerful? Or will it be a Corbyn-led Labour government that promises to introduce measures that not only reverses the impact of a decade of austerity but also to change the acceptance that it is only through competition and marketisation of the economy that society can function.

A Corbyn-led government would signal an end to all those painful and so damaging senior management emails that remind us that we are a ‘business’ and our students are our ‘customers’, as they continue to drive through the stack em high, sell em cheapbrand of higher and further education.

I cant wait

We have the opportunity to put into office a Labour government that promises within the first 100 days it will abolish the Tory anti-union laws and set up a Ministry of Labour to introduce legislation to create national collective sectoral bargaining. A Corbyn-led Labour government promises to create 400,000 green jobs and to reduce carbon emissions to net zero by 2030, end the privatisation of our public services, scrap tuition fees and reintroduce EMA. The Labour Party Conference voted to ‘maintain and extend free movement’ to end the hostile environment created by the Tories as they attempted to scapegoat immigrants for their disastrous polices. This too must be in their manifesto.

Labour has started the campaign well, but there it is a long way to the 12th December.

The Tories and the media, as well as attacking Jeremy Corbyn for being a terrorist-loving, baby-eating Marxist who would turn Britain into a Gulag, will attempt to focus the election around the single issue of Brexit. They will claim that Corbyns position is confusing and difficult for the electorate to understand.

Whilst Corbyn’s position is one that I dont agree with, it is hardly complicated or confusing. Labour, if elected, will, within six months, renegotiate a deal and put it to the people to decide if they support it or not. Remain will be an option on the ballot paper. Why is this confusing?

Its not, but the Tories, the Liberal Democrats, and their media friends, want to keep the election focused on Brexit to divert the electorate from discussing their record as the architects of austerity that has wrecked so many people’s lives.

Dont vote for the yellow Tories

A vote for Jo Swinson is a vote to continue Tory policies. The Liberal Democrats had an opportunity to go into coalition with Gordon Browns Labour Party but decided to enter a collation with Camerons Tories. It is they, as the Tories’ Coalition partners, that launched the biggest attacks on working people since the 1930s. If they had to make that choice again, they would even more happily make the same choice and prop up a Johnson government rather than see Corbyn in Number 10.

No one should be surprised by this. The whole history of the Liberal Party has been one that has always taken the side of the establishment. It was under a Liberal government that leading Suffragettes were imprisoned, force-fed and tortured. This is why it is ridiculous for the Green Party to have agreed to join the ‘Remain Alliance’, a decision they will live to regret.

The Liberal Democrats are not the only ones who would prefer a Johnson government than a Corbyn one. Many Labour MPs feel the same way. Tom Watsons resignation for personalreasons followed by Ian Austins announcement that he too will not be standing (and calling for a vote for Johnson) tells us everything many of us suspected about the degree to which the Blairites oppose a Corbyn-led government.  No doubt more attacks like these are being planned.

We should say good riddance — go and join Chukka and his friends in the wilderness.

UCU can make a difference

UCU is not affiliated to the Labour Party. But it does have policy for calling for a vote for Labour. It was a motion Jo McNeil and I put to the 2017 UCU Congress and was passed overwhelmingly. UCU can make a real difference in ensuring that Jeremy Corbyn enters Downing Street on December 13th.

First, we have the announcement of eight days of strike action in HE starting on the 25th November. This announcement followed the brilliant ballot result where over sixty institutions got through the threshold and voted overwhelmingly to strike over Pay, Pensions, Casualisation, Workload and Equality. The strikes will allow us to take the issues that affect HE to the heart of the election campaign.

No doubt there will be pressure from within the General Council of the TUC on our General Secretary for UCU not strike to ensure there is no distractionfrom Labours election campaign. Strikes will not distract from getting Labour elected — they will be central to getting Corbyn elected. Strikes, as a part of the general election campaign, will also act as a reminder to the employers that if Corbyn is elected we will use our collective power to resist attempts to undermine that government. 

This election campaign must be run differently from any campaign that has been conducted before.  Already the signs are that Labours campaign is wanting to build upon the approach adopted in 2017; a campaign based on policies that show clear red water between the Tories and the Liberal Democrats, with mass rallies to mobilise the 500,000 Labour members to get the vote out. Strikes are part of this campaigning approach.

Second, UCU must implement the policy passed at the last NEC meeting, calling on the union to launch a Vote Education Campaign that encourages members to organise hustings, rallies and to set up stalls to inform the public what is happening to Further, Adult and Higher education.

29 November: join a carnival of resistance

School students will be striking for the climate on November 29th, and have called on the trade union movement to join them. One of the strike days that UCU chose to take action on will be the 29th.

We must turn 29th November into a carnival of resistance. UCU London Region has already called a March for pay, pensions and the planet. We will be marching to join the school students, and holding a rally. We will be inviting trade unionists and shadow front bench MPs to join us too. We will be looking to do the same across the country.

It wont be just HE colleagues who will marching on the 29th, but FE too. In particular, we want to highlight the plight of Adult Education. One of the biggest historic scandals throughout the period of austerity is what has happened to Adult Education. This is the education sector in which the budget has been cut by 45% in the last decade.

This year is the hundredth anniversary of the beginning of Adult Education. We want to carry a message into this election that we want a hundred years more.

We will be calling on postal workers, six form teachers and anyone else to join us on the day to take a collective message into the general election campaign that we want radical change.

We have four weeks to make history. I cant think of a better Christmas present than seeing Jeremy Corbyn in number 10 and John McDonnell in Number 11, but we will need to launch the fight of our lives to make the dream come true at the ballot box, on the streets and in the workplaces.

– Sean Vernell NEC

Vote Jo McNeill for A New General Secretary for UCU!

Vote Jo McNeill for UCU General Secretary
Vote Jo McNeill for UCU General Secretary

This is the last week that you will be able to vote for Jo McNeill in the General Secretary elections.
The election closes on Thursday 23rd May. Most people will have received their ballot papers by now. Last posting day is Monday 20th May.
We encourage all branch officers to organise a Get The Vote Out campaign for your branch.

  • Can you divide your membership list up amongst a few reps and ask them to contact members to check they’ve received their ballot papers and posted them?
  • Jo has produced a lot of excellent material which you can access via her website, Twitter and Facebook accounts and we recommend that you circulate to all members.
  • Can you attend the hustings in your area? See below for full list of hustings.

UCULeft is recommending a vote for the 3 candidates as follows:

Completed ballot paper

Please use your vote and post your ballot paper today!

Hustings

Date 15.05.19
Time 12:00
Host Heriot Watt UCU
Location Postgraduate Centre 2.02 Heriot Watt University

Date 15.05.19
Time 16:00
Host Edinburgh UCU
Location 1.17, Dugald Stewart Building Edinburgh University

Date 16.05.19
Time 12:00
Host UCU Scotland
Location 225: Humanities Lecture Theatre, Main Building Glasgow University

Date 17.05.19
12:00
Hosts SOAS UCU Birkbeck UCU, Hygiene and Tropical Medicine UCU and Senate House UCU
Location Paul Webley Wing SOAS 

Date 17.05.19
Time 15.30
Host City UCU
Location Room BG02, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB.

Date 20.05.19
Time 13:00
Host Durham UCU
Location Tbc

Date 20.05.19
Time 15:00
Host Newcastle UCU
Location Thomas’ Church, Haymarket

A vote for Matt Waddup is a vote for more centralism and less democracy

Picture1

Matt Waddup, UCU’s Head of Campaigns, has declared that he will be standing for General Secretary. He has been the main official responsible for implementing, or not, UCU policies since the union’s formation.

In his election blog he argues that his is the ‘unity candidate’.  He claims he would unite all the different ‘factions’ within the union. Nothing can be further from the truth. Waddup, by some margin, is in practice the most divisive GS candidate who has so far declared their intention to stand.

Waddup, and some who have endorsed him, make a lot of the fact that he was redbaited in the Daily Mall for his role in the USS dispute. They do so to demonstrate how effective he had been and how he was the ‘mastermind’ behind the dispute.

Redbaiting, however, is not something restricted to right wing papers like the Daily Mail. It has also been a long-term tactic used against Socialist activists in our union by Sally Hunt’s team with Waddup at the head. As a consequence, many members expressed concerns that the union would be vulnerable to attacks from the right-wing press who would use internal political differences to portray the union as divided. Indeed, this is exactly what happened when the Daily Mail attempted to redbait Waddup, Sally Hunt and lay activists during the USS dispute. As many of us warned, these attacks were extended across the union, with officials, left wing activists and even lay officers belonging to the right-wing group the Independent Broad Left (known for their passivity and timidity in the USS dispute as in other disputes) being portrayed as a militant left and smeared.

Waddup’s blog and his supporters point to the fact that he was an official with the RMT union to demonstrate his supposed left wing and militant credentials. The truth is somewhat different. Waddup left the union immediately after Bob Crow was elected and joined the AUT, one of the forerunners of UCU. Waddup in fact had campaigned against Bob Crow and supported the right-wing candidate for General Secretary in the RMT.

As for him masterminding the USS dispute, again the opposite is true. It was the supporters of UCU Left who had to push to get the union to take the attacks on the USS pension seriously, and it was UCU Left supporters who pushed for a strategy of escalating national strike action. During the last General Secretary election campaign in 2017, Jo McNeill repeatedly attacked Sally Hunt’s industrial strategy and in response to this, Hunt proposed an Effective Industrial Action Commission during her Congress speech in 2017. McNeill wrote an emergency motion to democratise the Commission which was carried and UCU Left mobilised candidates for election to the EIAC and won all but one seat. It was this left led commission which Waddup took minutes at, which lay the groundwork for what would become the most effective strike action in the history of the HE sector.

Whilst Sally Hunt was the GS it was Waddup who was her key advisor. He pushed for the initial shockingly shabby compromise which took a huge rank and file members’ revolt outside Carlow Street to overturn to avoid a potential defeat.

Waddup’s role in the USS dispute has not been the only example of his weak strategical and tactical acumen. The disastrous industrial action in the 2015-16 HE pay dispute was another.  Waddup fully backed the proposals made by another leading official, Michael MacNeil, to pursue a strategy of 2-hour strikes (for which many members lost a whole day’s pay) and holding strikes on Saturdays and in the vacation period.  These tactics were proposed on the grounds they would ‘confuse the employers’ but in fact they ended up confusing and infuriating the membership. The reason that the USS action was effective was because branch activists in the union ensured that it did not repeat the mistakes of summer 2016.

Less democracy, more control.

Waddup’s vision for UCU is one that puts full time staff even more firmly in control of local and national disputes. For him effective organising is about full-time officials directing and controlling disputes and making sure that regional officials do what they are told by central office.

At the last NEC on March 15th2019, Waddup proposed a paper setting out new criteria for indicative ballots. There is no legislation whatsoever on indicative ballots, they are not a legal requirement, they are as described, indicative and used only to take the temperature of members attitude towards action. However, Waddup’s proposal stated that all indicative ballots must be facilitated by officials in Carlow St, branches can run their own at present. The proposal also ties all indicative ballots into extreme time constraints, a ten day turnaround, which will make getting a 50% turnout, which Head Office regularly tell us they expect, extremely difficult. This proposal alone puts further, unnecessary constraints on branches ability to take industrial action and is an indicator of Waddup’s intention to move towards a more tightly top down controlled union. This paper was carried at NEC by a vote of 25:24 and will have to be overturned at Congress.

When the union was first set up Waddup vigorously campaigned to dismantle the union’s regional lay member structures. He saw them as a threat to the centralised control of the full-time apparatus of the union. Although he did not succeed, he still views them as a block to his vision and ignores regions until he can abolish them.

Waddup’s role in the walkouts and shut down of Congress 2018 also demonstrates his support for a highly centralised union structure where the notion that members might attempt to hold a GS to account plays no role. The debacle at Congress 2018 was an attempt by him and others to undermine UCU’s democratic structures by trying to block members from debating motions, democratically brought from their branches, criticising the role of the GS and himself for how they handled the USS dispute.

Again, it took grass roots organising to defeat Waddup and his team.

Waddup’s vision is a trade unionism that is primarily a professional exercise in organising and negotiating where members and branches are of secondary importance in winning disputes. For officials like Waddup, when members are called upon to fight back, they need to be controlled to ensure that they can be turned on and off like a tap.

When UCU was formed some twelve years ago Waddup was forced to retreat from his centralised professional union model, effectively a servicing model, by the strength of the left. We proposed an alternative member-led, democratic and fighting trade unionism centred on inclusive campaigning against privatisation, casualization and the race to the bottom for pay and conditions. He now believes he can return to his project by becoming GS. It would be a huge step backwards for our members if this were to happen.