Students will lose out in for-profit universities (HE Convention letter)

Published in the Guardian 20 May.

Sign on the HE Convention website

The Government’s White Paper, Success as a Knowledge Economy, views Higher Education as if it were nothing more than an investment in human capital and a contributor to economic growth. It accepts that current universities are world-leading in teaching and research but then falsely asserts there is a problem of quality! The solution to this non-existent problem, the Government claims, is to open the sector to private for-profit teaching providers.

The proposed unitary ‘Office for Students’ is little more than an agency to ensure market competition. Ofstud is not intended to support students, but rather to enable private providers to have access to high tuition fees, to be staffed by board members with ‘the experience of fostering choice and competition, and of robust financial control’.

Students are supposedly ‘at the heart of the system’, yet the quality regime proposed – the Teaching Excellence Framework – includes no direct measures of teaching quality. Rather it is designed to facilitate increases in fees, with the possibility of a more radical lifting of the fee cap in the future once the new arrangements are established.

The Government claims these arrangements will maintain quality in higher education, but the history of for-profit higher education is littered with poor student outcomes, and with spending more on marketing and profit-sharing than on instruction. For-profits are able to do this precisely because they are ‘unbundled’ institutions relieved – now by proposed Government legislation on degree-awarding powers and the title of university – of the wider functions of a university.

Vice Chancellors have gone along with the conversion of public funding of higher education into a debt-fee model of funding to maintain their revenues. This was always a bargain struck against the interest of students, but now the very idea of a university is at stake. We call upon our colleagues and the wider public to speak out to put the values of a university, of academic freedom and of genuine quality education for all who can benefit, where these values belong: at the heart of the system.

Our vision, published as an Alternative White Paper for HE, will be published very shortly.


Professor John Holmwood (Nottingham, and Campaign for the Public University, CPU)
Elizabeth Lawrence (Sheffield Hallam, UCU President)
Sean Wallis (UCL and UCU NEC)
Tom Hickey (Brighton UCU)
Professor Howard Hotson (Oxford)
Lee Jones (Queen Mary and CPU)
Rachel Cohen (City and UCU NEC elect)
Carlo Morelli (Dundee and UCU NEC)
Professor Barry Smart (Portsmouth and CDBU)
Professor Andreas Bieler (Nottingham and UCU NEC)
Professor Des Freedman (Goldsmiths UCU)
Professor Natalie Fenton (Goldsmiths UCU)
Professor Gurminder K Bhambra (Warwick and CPU)
Jo McNeill (Liverpool and UCU NEC)
Saira Weiner (Liverpool John Moores and UCU NEC)
Marion Hersh (Glasgow and UCU NEC)
Dr Patricia McManus (Brighton and UCU NEC)
Xanthe Whittaker (Leicester and UCU NEC)
Dr Lesley McGorrigan (Leeds and UCU NEC)
Professor Paul Blackledge (Leeds Beckett and UCU NEC)
Dr Carles Ibanez (Edinburgh Napier and EIS NEC)
Sean Vernell (City & Islington FE and UCU NEC elect)
Mandy Brown (Lambeth College FE and UCU NEC)
Amy Jowett (Hackney ACE and UCU NEC)

[and many, many more]

Sign on the HE Convention website

One Reply to “Students will lose out in for-profit universities (HE Convention letter)”

  1. Need for Solidarity and a Lecturer led vision. Time to stop the rot

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.